Baby food
for thought
·
Let mothers feed their babies for as long as
they could. Efforts to feed every new-born baby with a ‘scientific’ formula
instead of the God-given mother’s milk should stop for the common good. When
governments are in cahoots with the industry mankind suffers
“Successful people are always looking for opportunities to help others.
Unsuccessful people are always asking, “What's in it for me?”— Brian Tracy
“Successful people are always looking for opportunities to help others.
Unsuccessful people are always asking, “What's in it for me?”— Brian Tracy
I
understand that there are efforts to feed every new-born baby with a
‘scientific’ formula instead of the God-given mother’s milk. In the unholy
nexus between the greedy industry and the corrupt government agencies to try
and sell this new idea to the gullible public, the real unsuspecting victims
are the yet to be born future generations. When something is advertised in the
name of the holy ‘science’ especially of the western variety that we, Indians,
venerate as gospel truth, truth and reality take a back seat. Let us, for a
change, examine the reality behind the new-born babies and their natural food.
Let us not fall a prey to this heavy
industrial advertisement. Advertisement is the bane of mankind’s present
misery. There have been thinkers even in the west who had warned us against
falling prey to advertisement from time to time. John Kenneth Galbraith was one
such giant in the field who had warned us as far back as 1958 in his book, The Affluent Society thus:
Galbraith argued that in
our societies’ wants and desires are created by the very process through which
they are satisfied. Galbraith feels that corporations do not advertise to
inform us about products that might satisfy our own pre-determined desires.
Rather, they use advertising and marketing “to bring into being wants that
previously did not exist.” Galbraith describes this “the dependence effect,”
and argues that this is an indictment of the entire system of capitalistic
production, which is “no more defensible than a town doctor routinely running
over pedestrians in order to keep the hospital beds full”.
Poor
Galbraith, may his soul rest in peace, did not
know that disease mongering by various cunning methods is what the medical
business does these days to fill their hospital beds and their coffers. In a
full issue of the famous medical science journal, PLOSmedicine, the editor Ray Moynihan, had published eleven
articles on this art of disease mongering. The above-mentioned efforts to sell
infant formulae for baby feeding are another one of that disease mongering
efforts right from the time of birth! Makes very good business sense. Every new
born will, per force, become a patient. What better method could be there to
fill the hospital beds and our coffers than this novel idea?
Human
beings do not have milk digesting enzymes after weaning from mother’s milk.
Mother’s milk is specially designed for the new born babies with special
qualities. It is the only method that the mother transfers her own immune
bodies to her baby to keep it safe during infancy. An infant does not have
pancreatic lipase enzyme to digest fat. So mother’s milk is one of those fats
that could be digested by salivary enzymes in the mouth. As the infant sucks
the breast the milk gets digested in the mouth and then gets absorbed. The ONLY
other fat that can be digested by salivary enzymes in the mouth is the fat in
cocoanut oil. Mother’s milk and cocoanut oil contain the same fatty
acids—sodium mono-laureates. Mono-lauric acid is the fatty acid that goes to
make immune bodies to protect us against diseases. Any infant feed should and
can only have cocoanut as the fat base. Other fats, if used, might damage the
baby’s system. Moral of this story is that mother’s milk is the only sane and
healthy food for an
infant. No food, however scientifically prepared by our industry, can ever
replace mother’s milk. The best alternative would be to create breast milk
banks to collect excess milk from those that have too much milk to feed babies
who either have lost their mothers or whose mothers do not make enough milk.
Ideally the baby could be fed breast milk for as long as possible. If a baby
gets mother’s milk for more than two years it should remain healthy all through
its life.
Milk from
other animals is not good food and is threatening to be a time-bomb, provoking
powerful anti-bodies against many of our organs, especially the pancreas. One
of the important causes of excess diabetes
in society could be traced to drinking milk from other species. Our
village cows, without the hump on their back, are less antigenic compared the
large Jersey cows. Milk needs to be curdled before being consumed to reduce the
antigenicity in denatured protein in curds and butter milk. If we learn to
observe nature we will soon realize that no animal drinks the milk of another
species in nature. How could man alone drink other animal milk with impunity?
From altruistic sense also it looks bad. We are robbing the calf of its share
of its mother’s milk. For the lay readers one fact could make lots of sense in
this area.
Observe a
calf as soon as it is born. It jumps out and runs. Human baby needs almost a
year and more to do that. If we give our infants the milk with such powerful
enzymes that make the calf walk away almost after birth the long-term results
could be dangerous. In addition, today one does
not get natural cow’s milk in the market, thanks to the new white
revolution. The greedy industry encourages dairy farmers to use powerful
hormones to boost milk out put. Most of the former are growth hormones which will
have disastrous consequences in human youngsters! In addition, mastitis is a
common disease in dairies. On an average 10% of the cows get mastitis every
day. The present algorithm for treatment is to put ciprofloxacin, a powerful
antibiotic worth nearly Rs8,000, into the cow’s udder to contain the germs
there. The milk of that cow shall not be used for at least a week after the cow
gets better. How many farmers would do that with their greed for more money? So
our milk could be full of antibiotics and growth hormones! It is not surprising
that we generate dangerous superbugs in society which are now posing a great
threat to human life.
If one
treats nature as mother, nature feeds and protects us; if we, on the contrary,
use nature as our mistress, she will kick us in the teeth. That is what she is
doing now, thanks to man’s proclivity for comfort and his greed! Let mothers
feed their babies for as long as they could. Their shape does not go bad. In
fact, they get better health by breast feeding. Breast cancer
incidence does go down. More babies one feeds better would be one’s health and
longer will be the life. Let us bring forth a healthy generation with natural
resources. Science can never win over nature and make better products any day.
Western science shall not be our master; rather let us use it for our good only. Industry could still make money ethically. Let them not gang up with the governments to harm the populace. When governments are in cahoots with the industry mankind suffers. Formula feeding should stop for the common good.
Western science shall not be our master; rather let us use it for our good only. Industry could still make money ethically. Let them not gang up with the governments to harm the populace. When governments are in cahoots with the industry mankind suffers. Formula feeding should stop for the common good.
“He who is not contented
with what he has, would not be contented with what he would like to have” —Socrates
More from Dr BM Hegde
(Professor Dr BM Hegde, a Padma
Bhushan awardee in 2010, is an MD, PhD, FRCP (London, Edinburgh, Glasgow & Dublin),
FACC and FAMS. He is also Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the Science of
Healing Outcomes, Chairman of the State Health Society's Expert Committee, Govt
of Bihar, Patna. He is former Vice Chancellor of Manipal University at
Mangalore and former professor for Cardiology of the Middlesex Hospital Medical
School, University of London.)
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment