20% TDS as per Section 206AA of IT Act is Unconstitutional Partially - Karnataka High Court

 

20% TDS as per Section 206AA of IT Act is Unconstitutional Partially  - Karnataka High Court.

The assessee, whose income was below taxable limit, filed Form 15Gand requested that no TDS be deducted on the interest on fixed deposit. However, she was informed that in view of s. 206AA inserted by Finance Act 2009, TDS would have to be deducted in the absence of PAN. The assessee filed a writ petition to challenge Section 206AA as being arbitrary and unconstitutional to the extent that it compelled persons with no taxable income to obtain a PAN. HELD upholding the challenge:

 

U/s 139A, only persons whose income is chargeable to tax are required to obtain a PAN. However, section  206AA compels even persons without a taxable income to obtain a PAN to avoid TDS. This creates difficulty for poor and illiterate persons who make small investments  and discourages them to invest money. Section  206AA runs counter to Section 139A and is discriminatory. Though the Legislature's intention is to bring maximum persons under the income-tax net, it may not insist that even persons whose income is below the taxable limit have to compulsorily obtain a PAN. If any tax avoidance is detected, that can be taken care of by penal provisions. Accordingly,  Section 206AA is read down as being inapplicable to persons whose income is less than the taxable limit. Banks & financial institutions should not insist upon PAN from such small investors. It continues to apply to persons whose income is above the taxable limit.