India on Monday raised the import duty on gold to 6% from 4%,
stepping up efforts to curb the import of the yellow metal—a major
contributor to the widening current account deficit (CAD) in Asia’s
third-largest economy.
Besides
hiking the tax, the government also proposed to link gold
exchange-traded funds or ETFs and the gold deposit schemes of
banks to encourage investors to use existing gold stock in the
domestic market. This will release a part of the gold physically
held by mutual funds under gold ETFs and enable them to deposit
the gold with banks under the deposit scheme, the government said.
The
government has also proposed some changes in the way gold deposit
schemes operate to make the products attractive for investors. The
minimum tenure of deposits will be reduced to six months from
three years, according to the proposed changes.
While
the government’s actions are intended at discouraging import of
physical gold to the country, experts warned that the measures
could encourage smuggling of the precious metal and make gold a
less attractive option to invest.
“Unofficial
channels (in the gold market) are likely to increase following the
hike in import duty,” said T.
Gnanasekar, director of Mumbai-based commodity and
forex research firm Commtrendz Research and Fund Management.
“Overall,
the move is also negative for the gold market as it can put
pressure on prices and will cause the investment demand to come
down,” said Gnanasekar.
Domestic
gold price stood atRs.30,396 per 10g on
Monday, up 0.25%, according to data on the Multi Commodity
Exchange of India Ltd. It has risen 11% in the past one year.
Import concerns
Rising
import of gold has been a major concern for the government and the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as it has been put pressure on India’s
widening current account deficit. The deficit, which is the
difference between a country’s import and exports of goods,
services and transfers, rose to a record high of 4.2% of gross
domestic product (GDP) in 2011-12.
Transfers
comprise currency transfers by one country to another in the form
of aid or donations. A high deficit means a significant erosion in
a country’s foreign assets.
In
the July-September quarter, the deficit widened to a record 5.4%
of GDP.
Gold
imports constituted 11.5% in India’s total imports basket in
2011-12 in value terms, growing from 6.9% in 2008-9.
In
2011-12, India’s gold imports amounted to $56.5 billion. In the
current fiscal year up to December, gold imports are estimated at
$38 billion, according to official data.
In the 12 months ended September 2012, India’s gold demand stood
at 793.1 tonnes, down 28% from the year ago period, according to
data from the World Gold Council (WGC).
The
fall in demand was attributed to rise in gold prices in 2012 and
failed monsoon in some parts of India that lowered the purchasing
capacity of people, according to WGC.
According
to Indranil
Pan, chief economist Kotak Mahindra Bank, any
effort to curb the gold imports could have an impact on the
domestic currency, which will, in turn impact prices.
“This
move will make gold expensive, but it is very difficult to see
what the real effect will be. If you are trying to stop gold
imports, it could appreciate the rupee, and that could offset the
rise in gold prices,” Pan said.
According
to Pan, by linking the gold ETFs to the deposit scheme, RBI is
trying to unlock a bit of the gold holding. “It will help RBI to
meet the internal demand. But one will have to see the amount of
the ETF gold holding to gauge the real impact of this,” Pan said.
Announcing
the measures, the finance ministry said it has consulted with
sectoral regulators Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi)
and RBI to effect the changes. The respective regulators will
issue circulars in this regard, the release said.
“There will be a definite reduction in gold imports in the near
future, but it is too early to say whether there will be a
reduction in the long term as well,” said Nayan
Pansare, an independent gold analyst in Mumbai.
According to Pansare, the demand for the yellow metal will rest on
the economic factors and will be driven mainly by rural India.
Demand for gold is likely to be robust, provided the country sees
a good monsoon, he said.
Currently,
India has two gold related schemes—gold ETF and the gold deposit
scheme.
In
gold ETFs, offered by mutual funds, units are sold to subscribers
through ‘authorized participants’ and are traded on the exchange.
The units are backed by physical gold held by the mutual funds.
Money collected under any gold ETF is invested by the mutual fund
in gold or gold-related instruments.
On
the other hand, gold deposit schemes are offered by banks. Under
this, banks accept gold deposited by clients and the gold is
on-lent by the banks to the gems and jewellery trade.
At
the end of the deposit period, the depositor is entitled to a
return of physical gold or its equivalent in cash at the current
market price of gold.
“The
deposit scheme has a limitation. Most of the gold available in
India is in jewellery form (that cannot work in deposit schemes).
A lot of gold is available with temples also, but that too is in
jewellery form. It is a beginning, we will have to see how the
deposit plans work. It is likely to be slow initially,” Pansare
said.
Recently,
an RBI panel headed by K.U.B.
Rao—an adviser to RBI’s department of economic and
policy research— had proposed introduction of gold-backed
financial products to discourage investments in physical gold.
The
new products, according to the panel, could be in the form of gold
accumulation plans, gold-linked accounts, modified gold deposits
and gold pension products, the panel said.
Gold’s
attraction stems from the metal giving the best return among all
financial instruments during a period of high inflation, Nomura
said in a report.
“Unless
investors have options on other financial instruments, which
provide an inflation hedge, we think import duties will only lead
to a reduction in gold imports through the official channel and
result in a simultaneous rise in gold imports through unofficial
channels,” it said.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete